chelboy

Members_2012
  • Content count

    4,147
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Everything posted by chelboy

  1. Chelsea 7 Norwich City 0

    Yeah the comments don’t make sense, I’m not saying Werner or Haverz have been good I’m just saying I don’t think CHO would play much better if given the chance.
  2. Chelsea 7 Norwich City 0

    You could argue that CHO deserves more of a chance as the other attackers have been poor so far. I’m not against giving CHO more of a chance in the front three but I don’t think he will play much better than the others. All of them except Mount lack consistency. They drop too many 4’s or 5’s during the season for me.
  3. Chelsea 7 Norwich City 0

    Indeed, his finishing has improved.
  4. Chelsea 7 Norwich City 0

    He’s had less game time this season to be fair. We bought him to be a starter but I don’t think he’s good enough to be starting for us.
  5. Chelsea 7 Norwich City 0

    Chilwell has done that about four or five times today, runs with the ball then is very casual when playing it.
  6. Chelsea 7 Norwich City 0

    True in some way but CHO just doesn’t do it consistently enough and barely plays. I don’t think anyone really knows CHO true level until he plays week in week out. This isn’t a good game to judge him by tbh. This is a walk in the park.
  7. Chelsea 7 Norwich City 0

    Werner would as he is a fully established international player. CHO has never played a full season of football. If CHO was to go to the Bundesliga for a season or two he would probably cost more than Werner. I think that league can make any attacker look half decent.
  8. Chelsea 7 Norwich City 0

    Wow these lot are bad. Game over already. Good pass by Kova. He’s adding more assists to his game.
  9. Chelsea 7 Norwich City 0

    The player holding us back is our top scorer who has been our best attacker so far? What about the other £200M we spent on Havertz, Ziyech, Werner and Pulisic? It’s been nearly 18 months now and none of them have shown consistent league form. That’s what’s holding us back.
  10. You could be correct, perhaps I was exaggerating but Pulisic misses more than a game or two when he gets injured. He hasn’t returned yet and it’s nearly November but somehow this probably won’t be Pulisic last injury of the calendar year of 2021. Wouldn’t surprise me if he gets another injury November-December.
  11. Chelsea 7 Norwich City 0

    I would have started RLC instead of Kova, other than that it’s a good line up.
  12. He’s been like this for a year now. It’s like watching a different player. I think he should just focus on hanging around the box waiting for something to drop rather than trying to make stuff happen outside the box. Anyway I think this will be Pulisic’s final year at the club. He can barely go injury free for 8 weeks during the season and he only stays fit when we have a fully fit team. It’s quite frustrating.
  13. Chelsea 4 Malmo FF 0

    Would be a really good time for Pulisic to suddenly recover.
  14. Chelsea 4 Malmo FF 0

    Strikers setting up strikers to score only for Werner to miss an open goal. Defenders setting up defenders to score and Christensen scores lol…
  15. Brentford 0 Chelsea 1

    We just need Mount to get back to form. Without him on form our attack just isn’t the same tbh. His levels have been pretty high now for the last 18 months or so. It was bound to dip at some point. Just hope he comes back before the thick winter period comes into play.
  16. Brentford 0 Chelsea 1

    Wouldnt swap Mendy for any GK in the world. What a performance. I had RLC as Motm until those last 25 mins.
  17. Brentford 0 Chelsea 1

    Quality strike. Good time to score. Forces them to come out in the 2nd half.
  18. Brentford 0 Chelsea 1

    Had he stayed onside he wouldn’t have reached the ball tbh.
  19. Brentford 0 Chelsea 1

    Christensen is the most experienced defender at the back today. Not sure what to make of that. After a Int break you don’t take risks like that imo. I would have put an experienced head in the back 3. Hope TT proves me wrong.
  20. Brentford 0 Chelsea 1

    Again with the 3 cm’s that don’t play in between the lines then Werner and Lukaku up front. Who’s going to play in those pockets of space and link midfield with attack? Also Sarr… really? Could have put Azpi cb and CHO on the wings. Playing into Brentford hands with that team.
  21. Chelsea 3 Southampton 1

    Is his touch that bad though? How many bad touches does he have per game that break down attacks? It feels like Werner has more than him per game. I get that it isn’t as smooth as others but I think some exaggerate just how bad it is. It doesn’t really stop him from scoring goals or stop us from scoring goals. Like I said with an average touch he still could have scored a hat trick yesterday or got an assist. Tbh I thought he was good enough against Liverpool especially in the 1st half. City and Juve games he was poor but tactics didn’t help him especially against City.
  22. Chelsea 3 Southampton 1

    No, just no. Lukaku is levels above whatever level Kepa was and will always be. To call him a panic buy is pretty funny. We tried to buy this guy 4 years ago. What are these huge flaws people keep talking about? I know he has some flaws but huge ones? I can’t see any. People are just waiting for games in which he doesn’t score to take their chance to criticise. He’s been our best attacker so far this season ( by a distance ) and will probably be our best attacker for the entire season. If he’s not good enough for a top four team what does that say about the rest of our attackers? . He could have had a hat trick yesterday, it just wasn’t his day and even then he still caused problems and created a clear cut chance.
  23. Chelsea 3 Southampton 1

    Good sub to bring on Barkley. We didn’t need another body in the box. We needed better forward passing from deeper positions. Barkley did that within seconds of coming on. Passes like that is what we need against these teams that just stay in their box.
  24. Chelsea 3 Southampton 1

    Lukaku and Azpi missed on purpose for Chilwell to redeem himself. Only explanation for two 5 yard misses.