Founding Member

FFS James, get a clue will you? I note you dodged replying to me here on exactly the same points; Still waiting....

So, apart from the training ground, the players, the trophies, the global standing, the European recognition and the backing of the supporter initiatives, what has the Roman ever done for us? ;-)

They wouldn't, in the same way we wouldn't if Roman left. Someone else would have to buy the club, debt and all.

Some of these will have you crying with laughter, some worse. http://jamrags.com/

He'll be back as soon as we lose a game...

It's not, it's a forum. There is a difference.

Bigger than the Premership wins? Get a grip.

Only the comments that suited them, naturally. I think it's us as a club they hate, and they find reason to make everyone else do so too. I feel they are trying to drive Didier out of English football, mainly because he makes us so damn good - he's got worse press than Joey Barton, and that's a disgrace, not to mention the hypocrisy about the diving issue. They hate Ashley and are actively trying to split him and the nations favourite Geordie lass up, which would never had happened had he still been at Arsenal (look how Abedeyors wage demands were handled compared to Cole's, hardly a word said about him but Ash has been 'Cashley' ever since). They've gone after Lampard recently with Elen, and Terry with.... er anyone in a skirt. They had vile stories ready to go on Grant and I'm surprised Mikel didn't get a bigger pasting in the media than he did... the list goes on and on.... I believe it's also due to the combination of Roman, Kenyon, Greenberg and Simon Taylor - not a name many of you will have heard, that are the root cause. Roman doesn't play their game, and they don't like it. Greenberg plays them at their own game, and often wins - and they really don't like it. Kenyon, well... I like the bloke but I think everyone else's views are well documented. Simon Taylor used to be head of media at Chelsea and handled all the day to day press, and not one journo I ever met ever had a good word to say about him, in fact most left briefings, interviews and conferences cursing his name - which meant they weren't in a mood conducive to writing nice things about us. Thankfully he's been moved sideways now and the new head of media is a far warmer and more welcoming bloke - yet it doesn't appear to have lessened the vitriol that much more.

Maybe we should make Drogba director of communications? Couldn't be any more of a f**king disgrace! :)

Here's your posts; http://forums.CFCnet.co.uk/index.php?act=S...sult_type=posts Not one of them is in any way positive of shows any care or consideration for 'our' club. All you do is slag Didier off.... Troll, I'm certain.

Ok, not attacking Newcastle but I think your club is an embarrassment. Which is true. From the rules (which you agreed to when signing up);

Ofcom to investigate Sky broadcast.

Don't know if this has been posted yet, but not a bad piece from the Times; Chelsea now resemble a normal business Graphic; http://extras.timesonline.co.uk/pdfs/chels...erscrunched.pdf

Here it is; http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11661_4855502,00.html The final quote is comedy gold; "We have no intention of launching a hostile takeover. This is only possible as a friendly deal." I wasn't aware a hostile takeover was even possible where one person owns 100% of the shares in the company, and none are publicly listed.