• Current Donation Goals

Sir

Squad Status: 2017/2018 Season

Recommended Posts

paulw66   
1 hour ago, Sleeping Dave said:

I think we can feel a little bit more certain in who's driving the small squad issue at our club. 

It certainly wasn't Mourinho (given the squad size he's had with other clubs and now Man U). 

Not disagreeing with you, but in some ways Jose definitely cause a smaller squad by never rotating, even with players like KdB, Schurrle, Salah and Cuadrado at various times, none of whom got much of a look in. 

In 2014/15 we played Shrewsbury away in the LC, Hazard came on as sub. We then played Derby away, Hazard played 90 minutes. Swansea away, 4-0 up at half time, Hazard played 90 minutes. He flogged our best players even when we had options. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, paulw66 said:

Not disagreeing with you, but in some ways Jose definitely cause a smaller squad by never rotating, even with players like KdB, Schurrle, Salah and Cuadrado at various times, none of whom got much of a look in. 

Yes.  But not to the extent that Conte has done.  Both take some blame in this.  And it cost JM his job here (for which he may well be very greatful).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, paulw66 said:

Not disagreeing with you, but in some ways Jose definitely cause a smaller squad by never rotating, even with players like KdB, Schurrle, Salah and Cuadrado at various times, none of whom got much of a look in. 

In 2014/15 we played Shrewsbury away in the LC, Hazard came on as sub. We then played Derby away, Hazard played 90 minutes. Swansea away, 4-0 up at half time, Hazard played 90 minutes. He flogged our best players even when we had options. 

Never rotating? 

Never rotating was last season. That was litterally "never rotating" and pales in comparison to how Jose used his squad. Not saying we couldn't have rotate more under Jose, but I think it's slightly bizarre to claim he never rotated when the current incumbent is a lot worse. 

Jose always rotated but of course played his best team more often than not. However, that is hardly something that is out of the ordinary. 

Edited by Sleeping Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, A Blue Essien said:

Again, the most striking difference between the 2 squads are the AM's.

They have 5 proper options (6 if you include Young). We have 3. 

They play 3 Am's in the starting 11 so that is 6 players for 3 positions, two of witch play as strikers. Add Moses or Cesc to Hazard, Pedro, and Willian and we have 4 wingers for two winger positions and Musonda who we don't really know will contribute anything yet so I will not include.

28 minutes ago, Droy was my hero said:

26 Man U players

You do realize Jose won't actually be pulling on the shirt and getting on the pitch, Conte is definitely a better option if it comes down to that! Its 25 players, 24 players if you discount Tuanzebe. (23 if you discount Matic ;-) )

34 minutes ago, Droy was my hero said:

If you think we can compete for CL or PL with 17 players + GKs, I think you should say so,

I don't expect us to challenge in the CL, expect to get out the group and possibly the next round depending on who we draw. I expect us to challenge for the PL, not going to say we will win it as it is too tight to call these days but I expect top 3. I've also pointed out the financial reasons as to why we don't have the same options. If we had Carrick and Young on large contracts many would still not be happy and questioning why we still have them and they haven't been replaced. I agree we are two or three players short and the club has to re-evaluate their stance on players over the age of 30 as that is the only way to keep a full squad where players don't expect to play every game. They also need to re-evaluate playing the youth players as the best ones won't stick around and the squad should have a blend of ages, other than Rashford every position in the United team is well and truly blocked for any youth player to get a shot. One could even describe it as parking the bus between youth and first teams. as I pointed out earlier this is clearly not part of our strategy. Ultimately once/if Chelsea gets that blend right it should become an evolving process where we are in a much better position long term of producing our own talent meaning we can focus transfer fees on the cream of the crop to supplement that.

35 minutes ago, Droy was my hero said:

But since when has having 3 fit CBs been a problem for any club?  5 fit CBs and just 12 other  outfield players sounds more of a problem to me.

One of our CB's has already played in CM this season, Azpi can play pretty much anywhere behind the AM's and Rudiger has played RB in a 4 throughout his career so we have that adaptability in our players which will help (not solve) with the smaller squad. Same as it did when we won the CL Final with a decimated squad as you pointed out. Jones has played CM not very well and Rojo has filled in at LB again not very well, they don't really have the same flexibility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Lump Of Celery said:

You do realize Jose won't actually be pulling on the shirt and getting on the pitch, Conte is definitely a better option if it comes down to that! Its 25 players, 24 players if you discount Tuanzebe. (23 if you discount Matic ;-) )

No of course it was a joke - which is why I referred to the Grenfall Game he played in recently.  But they do have a 21 year old GK3 who I am sure is part of the squad and appeared pre-season.

1 hour ago, Sleeping Dave said:

Never rotating was last season. That was litterally "never rotating" and pales in comparison to how Jose used his squad. Not saying we couldn't have rotate more under Jose, but I think it's slightly bizarre to claim he never rotated when the current incumbent is a lot worse. 

Jose always rotated but of course played his best team more often than not. However, that is hardly something that is out of the ordinary. 

More or less yes.

Certainly JM rotated more than Conte.  But in 14/15, we did have only 12 players with 10 PL starts (13 last year, and all 16 fit options in 15/16).
JM doesn't rotate much, Conte even less.

 

1 hour ago, Lump Of Celery said:

One of our CB's has already played in CM this season, Azpi can play pretty much anywhere behind the AM's and Rudiger has played RB in a 4 throughout his career so we have that adaptability in our players which will help (not solve) with the smaller squad. Same as it did when we won the CL Final with a decimated squad as you pointed out. Jones has played CM not very well and Rojo has filled in at LB again not very well, they don't really have the same flexibility.

One of our CB's has already played in CM this season, - which to you is proof of his flexibility, and to me is proof of how overbalanced towards CBs our squad is.
It is funny when this topic comes up, people always adjust player flexibility to suit their own argument.
Generally anyone over 5'10" ends up as a CB by the end of their career.  Nobody converts into an AM except short strikers.
We are overstaffed at CB (with Alonso and Zappocosta and probably Bakayoko as further options).  We are understaffed at AM and strike with only Moses as an option there (and I doubt he'll play there until we get the expected emergencies).
.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
paulw66   
1 hour ago, Sleeping Dave said:

Never rotating? 

Never rotating was last season. That was litterally "never rotating" and pales in comparison to how Jose used his squad. Not saying we couldn't have rotate more under Jose, but I think it's slightly bizarre to claim he never rotated when the current incumbent is a lot worse. 

Jose always rotated but of course played his best team more often than not. However, that is hardly something that is out of the ordinary. 

But Conte had less games! 

Conte didn't need to rotate as we had no Europe and after getting knocked out of the LC, it was one game a week. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now